AMD And Intel Processor Comparison Information Technology Essay

AMD And Intel Processor Comparison Information Technology EssayAMD central central processors project deuce-ace ranges high end, middle and end keister. There are collar processors each category. Category consists of high end AMD Phenom II X6, AMD Phenom X4 and AMD Phenom II x2 II. Phenom II X6 is the first six- hollow out AMD processors are intended for the best level of work and precise high. Phenom X4 II is equipped with quad-core Phenom chips and chip-II X6 is specifically designed for the precise unusual lend bingleself of quality mul cartridge clipdia and ripe(p) applications.Phenom X2 II 2 core processor is the capacity to ensure high surgery is good overall with a very economical damage. Category consists of mid-end AMD Phenom X3 II, II, and AMD Turion AMD Turion Ultra II. II Phenom X3 is a client of class 3 core processors with 64- composition computing capabilities, designed to exit optimum performance with economy pricing. Both Turions multimedia products designed for the perfect and nigh of them come with an AMD or ATI lifelikes, of course, at a very economical price. AMD is the AMD Sempron basis, AMD Athlon and AMD Athlon X2 neo neo. Considered best for mobile computing, AMD Sempron is a popular choice for low figure desktop and laptop. The processor is suitable for very elementary computing ask such as browsing the Internet, the basic functions of the business leader and e-mail. Neo Neo Athlon and Athlon X2 comes with a lower processing power and economic strength of customers and or so are found in netbook and nettop. Because the integrated ATI graphics, the processor also offers basic feasible multimedia output.Intel ProcessorsNot to be outdone by AMD, Intel is a in force(p) competitor when it comes to Intel and AMD processor comparison. Similar to AMD, Intel also offers a range of lead processors the high end, mid end and the base the first category consists of three and the rest consists of two products. lofty-end c onsists of the latest series of Intel totality processors i Intel nubble i3, i5, and i7. amount of money and fondness i7 i5 comes with 2, 4 or 6 (there is only the bone marrow i7) and the ability of 64- buffalo chip processors. Both come with Hyper Threading technology and Turbo rising slope. Turbo Boost technology ensures change magnitude overall performance and handling aspect as the number of alive(p) cores, power consumption, processor temperature, etc. Core i3 also has this feature, except Turbo Boost technology. Core i5 has a cache memory is lower than the i7. Mid-end range includes Intel Core 2 Duo and Intel Pentium Dual Core processor. The former offers two core processes that improve the gaming and multimedia output. This last is based on Core micro-architecture and a decent multimedia output. Basic Intel processors, including Intel Centrino, Intel Centrino Duo and Intel Atom.Power ConsumptionWhen we disembodied spirit to overall power consumption of a system, Int el definitely suffered the early dilapidation . Its Pentium 4 processors had a very bad reputation of 150W TDP. Intel tried to unclutter the problem in its Intel i7 960 processor, which goes to less than 95W TDP. But, experiments have still proved that a machine running on an Intel i7 960 processor consumed, at least 7W to a greater extent than power, than an AMD Sempron . But in today AMD to produce a new product, AMD Phenom X4 II. ingathering in product far greater to AMD products before, This Power Consumption one hundred twenty-five watt AMD foot give than the Intel Core i7 , that only 95 .Its as well as big different if you compare whether product by AMD and Intel.Price vs. movementWhen it comes to the performance to cost ratio, AMD has definitely been the winner, for a long time. Its processors were cheaper, as compared to Intel and they definitely did offer high value performance. But, with the advent of the Intels Quadcore and Intel Core i7 processor, the situation has totally changed. The performance of a Intel Core i7 processor is, perhaps, the best in the grocery and its price is continuously falling.3D GamingThis is basically the feature that had allowed AMD to hold its top lay for a long time. Even with no graphics card, AMDs 64 act processor could take on the load and support the gaming features of forward-looking games. Intel, however, suffered an initial setback because the multithreading features that it allowed, were not used by umpteen games then. The AMD Phenom II X4 eccentric person could beat the Pentium 4 computers, in intimately all respects, when it came to gaming. But, the employee turnover once more, happened with the introduction of the Intel i7 960 processor processors. The scenario changed completely. Besides the equivalent features that these two processors could provide (when compared to the AMD Phenom II X4 ), they also had an added feature of supporting dual film tease.GraphicsThe comparison would again be the same, as that of the 3D gaming. AMD is a winner when its processors are compared to Intels preceding processors, and AMD Phenom X4 II. processors, with their supreme features, have helped Intel re gain the share of the market that it deserves.MP3 and Video EncodingAMDs 64 bit processors provided faster encoding of MP3s, as well as telecastings. The reason is simple a 64 bit processor exit, of course, be faster than a 32 bit processor. Intels 32 bit processors had higher clock frequencies, but while the clock absolute frequency of a 64 bit processor could be less, it worked at almost twice the speed than what was mentioned in its manual. This feature was also combated by Intel with its AMD Phenom X4 IIprocessors. If we do not run experiments to test the minutest details, then both the companies john provide good encoding capability for any average user.Cooling and ProductivityComputers working on Intel i7 960 processors definitely have superior cooling features and sna p off agitate sinks, when compared to the AMD machines. Not only this, but the Intel i7 960 could reach to a speed of 3.2 gigahertz on proper cooling.Office Productivity and MultitaskingFinally, we come down to the basic features, that any computer user is upset about the level of pip productivity, lucre browsing speeds and multitasking that their machines would provide. Just as a 32 bit processor and a 64 bit processor cannot be compared with respect to office productivity similarly, it is better if we dont compare these processors as well, on the level of their office productivity. You cannot actually notice a spreadsheet launching faster on your cloak or your letters being typed faster. Both the organizations are equivalent, when compared on the basis of their office productivity. But, coming down to multitasking, AMD with its 64 bit processors provided better multitasking features and no(prenominal) of the Intels processors, before the launching of the Core 2 Duo process ors could match up to it. But with the entry of Intels Core 2 Duo and Quadcore on the scene, we can again get word the situation balanced. Before we end this discussion, let us consider a few more common features that both these processors can grasp equivalently. It may not be of much concern to many people, but the processors manu occurrenceured by both the organizations support the sharing of the DDR2 RAM, peripherals and the video cards equally well. As a computer user, it is, in fact not necessary, to be a die-hard fan follower of the chips of each organizations. Just wait for the more advanced chip to be launched it may be from any organization, but you will definitely be the one to benefit.Which is emend AMD or Intel for Gaming?For gaming , what matters the most is how big is the graphic card or the video card. It would be interesting to know that AMD produces their processors property the ATI graphic cards in mind, whereas Intel makes their laptops to run better with N vidia graphic cards. sort of surprisingly, it was found that AMD machines had exceptional quality graphics as compared to Intels. Hence, if you are a hardcore gamer or like to watch everything in HD, then it is better to bet on an AMD processor laptop. Hence, AMD can be a dupe winner between AMD vs Intel for gaming. We cannot neglect the reputation of Intel at the same time for producing some amazing processors time and time again. Again, Intel has lately stormed the market with their phenomenal Core i series, which are truly amazing for their overall performance. I would say, analyze as per your usage and then decide upon which is better, AMD or Intel. If you emergency your computer for multimedia use like for gaming, music or video editing, etc., and want a gaming laptop, then I would suggest to commove an AMD powered machine. On the other hand, if you dont mind spending more on a computer for its overall performance and the efficient battery consumption, then nothing can be b etter than Intel. It can be canvas that, with AMD processors, you are able to get 90% of overall satisfaction with 60% of price. Whereas, with Intel based machines you can get over 98% or more of overall satisfaction with equal percentage of price.AMD vs Intel Processor Comparison graphUser RequirementAMDIntelPower ConsumptionLess efficient than Intel much efficient than AMDPrice RangeLowerHigherCooling ingredientHeats up fasterRuns cooler for a longer durationPerformance SpeedNot very Fast, compared to IntelFaster than AMDGaming and MultimediaBetter multimedia output due to faster clockingNot very good for gamingPerformancePriceHighLowHighHigh(Specifications)Example AMD IntelProductAMD Phenom II X4Intel Core i7Model Number965I7-880 mainframe computer Part NumberHDX965FBK4DGMBV80605002505AGCore NumberDeneb4MB shared L3 cache2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo1066MHz frontside bus3MB shared L2 cacheSocketSocket AM2+ / Socket AM3Socket 1156Frequency (MHz)34003067 measure Multiplier1723L1 cache 256 KB (code) / 256 KB (data)128 KB (code) / 128 KB (data)L2 cache (KB)20481024L3 cache (KB)61448922Max temperature (C)62TDP (Watt)12595ConclusionFinally, we look at to the basic features, that every computer user is worried about the level of office productivity, internet browsing speeds and multitasking that their machines would provide. Just as a 32 bit processor and a 64 bit processor cannot be compared with respect to office productivity, Similarly, it is better if we dont compare these processors as well, on the level of their office productivity. But, in this multitasking sides , AMD Phenom II X4 with its 64 bit processors provided better multitasking features and none of the Intels processors, Before we end this discussion, let us consider a few more common features that both these processors can handle equivalently. It may not be of much concern to many people, but the processors manufactured by both the organizations support the sharing of the DDR2 RAM, peripherals and th e video cards equally well. As a computer user, it is, not necessary, to be a fan follower of the chips of either organizations. Just wait for the more advanced chip to be launched it may be from any organization, but you will definitely be the one to benefit.Back to TopCopyright Hanif Aini2011